-
- Type:
- Survey analysis
With the end of the year fast approaching, we examine how organisations are going to mark the occasion for employees.
-
- Date:
- 6 October 2022
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
More than ever before, workers search for purpose in the workplace, seek work that makes an impact, and expect internal talent mobility that utilises their unique strengths and capabilities, says XpertHR senior analyst, HR strategy and insights, Laci Loew.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
A guide that looks at evaluating the impact of steps taken to develop employee performance.
-
- Date:
- 20 September 2022
- Type:
- News
Almost nine in 10 organisations trialling a four-day week with no loss of pay are likely to continue with a shorter working week beyond the six-month pilot.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
We guide HR professionals on helping employees to understand how their work ties in with organisation-wide objectives, as well as creating belonging and psychological safety in their organisation.
-
- Date:
- 7 September 2022
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
The unique combination of the coronavirus pandemic, deteriorating economic conditions, rise in flexible working (particularly hybrid/remote working) and increased awareness of the importance of maintaining wellbeing/good mental health has seen the concept of "quiet quitting" gaining traction. What steps - if any - should employers take to tackle this phenomenon?
-
- Type:
- Training
Enhanced with the addition of a PowerPoint presentation for training purposes.
-
- Date:
- 31 August 2022
- Type:
- News
The Office of Tax Simplification has launched a consultation into the tax status of remote and hybrid workers.
-
- Date:
- 16 August 2022
- Type:
- Case studies
Dematic talks to XpertHR about how it cut its gender pay gap and improved the gender balance of its workforce through a culture-change process focused on good leadership, good management and good practice.
-
- Date:
- 15 August 2022
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
XpertHR principal employment law editor Stephen Simpson argues that the blithe devaluing of equality, diversity and inclusion training by senior government figures fails to take account of the practical and legal benefits that such training brings for employers, especially if they are facing an employment tribunal.