Topics

Equality, diversity and human rights

New and updated

  • Date:
    1 December 1982
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Owen & Briggs v James

    In Owen & Briggs v James [1982] IRLR 502 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the Industrial Tribunal and the EAT had not erred in concluding that the appellants had acted in breach of the Race Relations Act by refusing or deliberately omitting to offer the respondent employment in that they had, on racial grounds, treated her less favourably than they had treated or would have treated other persons.

  • Date:
    1 July 1982
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Din v Carrington Viyella Ltd (Jersey Kapwood Ltd)

    In Din v Carrington Viyella Ltd (Jersey Kapwood Ltd) [1982] IRLR 281 EAT, the EAT held that the employer's conscious motive for taking a particular course of action, whilst it may be relevant, is not the decisive factor when considering whether racial discrimination has taken place.

  • Date:
    6 October 1981
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Discrimination: Standard uniform requirement discriminating against Sikhs held justifiable

    In Kingston & Richmond Area Health Authority v Kaur, the EAT has ruled that a requirement by a health authority that enrolled nurses wear a standard uniform which could not be varied is "justifiable" within the meaning of s.1(1)(b)(ii) of the Race Relations Act and that in applying such a requirement to a Sikh woman, whose religion requires her to wear trousers, the employers had not unlawfully indirectly discriminated against her.

  • Date:
    1 January 1981
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Page v Freight Hire (Tank Haulage) Ltd

    In Page v Freight Hire (Tank Haulage) Ltd [1981] IRLR 13 EAT, the EAT held that the employer was protected by the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, section 51(1) because refusing to allow the employee to transport dimethyl formamide was necessary to comply with the employer's duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was not an act of excessive caution.

  • Date:
    1 February 1980
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Panesar v The Nestle Co Ltd

    In Panesar v The Nestle Co Ltd [1980] IRLR 64 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the respondents' rule forbidding beards in their chocolate factory was "justifiable" within the meaning of the Race Relations Act 1976, section 1(1)(b).

  • Date:
    31 December 1979
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Malik v British Home Stores

    In Malik v British Home Stores [1980] ET/2901/79, the employment tribunal found that it was unlawful indirect race discrimination to require a Muslim woman of Pakistani origin to wear a uniform of an overall over a skirt.

  • Date:
    1 November 1979
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence

    In Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA, the Court of Appeal held that "subjecting to detriment" in the context of discrimination by employers, does not mean anything more than "putting under a disadvantage".

  • Date:
    1 March 1979
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Pointon v The University of Sussex

    In Pointon v The University of Sussex [1979] IRLR 119 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the appellant's claim under the Equal Pay Act could not be sustained because there was no term in her contract of employment that was less favourable than the equivalent term in the contract of the man with whom she was comparing herself.

  • Date:
    31 December 1978
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Dance v Dorothy Perkins Ltd

    In Dance v Dorothy Perkins Ltd [1978] ICR 760 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld a decision that female warehouse selectors were not engaged on like work with male warehouse operators. The men did significant additional duties to those done by the women.

  • Date:
    31 December 1977
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Ahmad v Inner London Education Authority

    In Ahmad v Inner London Education Authority [1977] ICR 490 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion established by Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights does not entitle an employee to be absent from work for the purpose of religious worship in breach of contract.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to equality, diversity and human rights.

Equality, diversity and human rights: quick links

Access our main resources on equality, diversity and human rights according to the type of information you need.