Topics

Managing employees/workers

New and updated

  • Date:
    15 April 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Employment status: Controlling shareholder could also be employee

    In Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill, the Court of Appeal upholds an employment tribunal's finding that a controlling shareholder of a company could also be an employee of that company for the purposes of the employment protection legislation.

  • Date:
    1 April 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Contracts of employment: Maximum 48-hour week is a statutorily implied term in all employment contracts

    In making the Working Time Regulations, Parliament intended that all contracts of employment must be read so as to provide that an employee should work no more than an average of 48 hours per week during any 17-week reference period, holds the High Court in Barber and others v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd.

  • Date:
    15 February 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Continuity of employment: Continuity not preserved during two-week breaks between contracts

    Employees employed by the same employer for total periods of between four and six years under a succession of temporary contracts of less than two years' duration, were not regarded as continuing in employment by custom or arrangement during regular two-week breaks between those contracts, holds the EAT in Booth and others v United States of America.

  • Date:
    11 February 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Francisco Hernandez Vidal SA v Gomez Perez and others

    In Francisco HernandezVidal SA v Gomez Perez and others [1999] IRLR 132 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that, for the purposes of EC Business Transfers Directive 77/187, an organised grouping of wage earners who are specifically and permanently assigned to a common task may, in the absence of other factors of production, amount to an economic entity.

  • Date:
    15 January 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Transfer of undertakings: Regulations do not apply to share transfers

    There was no transfer to which the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations applied when an industrial and provident society took over the management of local authority care homes by, in effect, acquiring the shares of the company that ran the homes and employed the staff who worked in them, holds the EAT in Brookes and others v Borough Care Services and CLS Care Services Ltd.

  • Date:
    15 November 1998
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Transfer of undertakings: Dismissal by reason of transfer is effective

    Employees who are dismissed by the transferor of an undertaking, and then re-engaged by the transferee on different but agreed terms, are not entitled to retain the benefit of their previous terms of employment, holds the House of Lords in Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council and Baxendale and Meade v British Fuels Ltd.

  • Date:
    1 June 1998
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Employer liability for work-related social function

    In Stubbs v Chief Constable Lincolnshire Police and others a Nottingham industrial tribunal (Chair: D R Sneath) holds Lincolnshire's chief constable liable for the unlawful acts of a male police officer who sexually harassed a female colleague in public houses after work.

  • Date:
    1 April 1998
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Continuity of employment: No contracting out of continuity provisions via ACAS settlement

    In Collison v British Broadcasting Corporation, the EAT holds that an ACAS-conciliated settlement did not operate to allow the parties to contract out of continuity of employment for the purposes of claims such as unfair dismissal and redundancy pay brought under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

  • Date:
    1 December 1997
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Continuity of employment: Retrospective arrangement cannot preserve continuity

    In Morris v Walsh Western UK Ltd, the EAT holds that an employer's ex post facto agreement to treat the period of an employee's absence from work as a period of unpaid leave was insufficient to preserve his continuity of employment.

  • Date:
    15 August 1997
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Transfer of undertakings: ETO reason required for variation of contract on transfer

    In (1) Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council (2) Meade and another v British Fuels Ltd, the Court of Appeal considers the position under the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations where employees' contracts of employment are terminated on a relevant transfer and they accept employment with the transferee on less favourable terms and conditions.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to managing employees/workers.