-
- Type:
- FAQs
-
- Date:
- 14 April 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Holis Metal Industries Ltd v GMB and another [2008] IRLR 187, the EAT refused to strike out a claim alleging breach of consultation duties arising pursuant to the TUPE Regulations 2006.
-
- Date:
- 29 January 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Regent Security Services Ltd v Power [2007] EWCA Civ 1188 CA, the Court of Appeal held that an employee transferred under the 1981 TUPE Regulations could choose to enforce new, more beneficial terms agreed with the transferee, even where the variation was connected with the transfer.
-
- Date:
- 11 January 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Jackson v Computershare Investor Services plc [2007] EWCA Civ 1065, the Court of Appeal ruled that the provision in the TUPE Regulations to the effect that a transferred contract of employment will have effect after the transfer as if originally made between the employee and the transferee could not be construed so as to give the employee a contractual benefit to which she had not been entitled under her original contract.
-
- Date:
- 23 November 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The High Court has held that an employee's resignation two days after he had been informed that he was being transferred was a valid objection to the transfer.
-
- Date:
- 11 July 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Millam v The Print Factory (London) 1991 Ltd [2007] IRLR 526 CA, the Court of Appeal held that where the operation - as opposed to the ownership of a business - transferred to a new owner, TUPE applied notwithstanding that the business was acquired on a sale of shares.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by Covington & Burling, covers TUPE transfers.
-
- Date:
- 2 February 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This article looks at some of the important judgments in the area of the transfer of undertakings over the past year.
-
- Date:
- 29 December 2006
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In London Metropolitan University v Sackur and others EAT/0286/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has confirmed that standardisation of employees' terms is not of itself sufficient to give rise to an ETO defence.
-
- Date:
- 1 December 2006
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Mackie v Aberdeen City Council [2006] CSIH 36, the Court of Session holds that there was no TUPE transfer when a private-sector employee working on a project for a local authority was subsequently offered a job in-house, despite a letter from the local authority indicating that a transfer had taken place.