TUPE

New and updated

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  TUPE: No transfer when employee became employed by group including original employer

  Hyde Housing Association Ltd and others v Layton [2016] IRLR 107 EAT, the EAT held that there was no TUPE transfer when an employee became employed by a group of entities that included his original employer, because the legal relationship between the employee and the original employer had not changed.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  TUPE service provision change: lay off does not prevent organised group of employees

  Laying off employees before a service provision change does not necessarily prevent them from transferring to the new employer under TUPE. Lindsay Macdonald reports on a recent case at the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer, Iain Naylor, Lucy Sorell and Rachael Wake are associates, and Jessica-Alice Curtis is a trainee solicitor at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  TUPE: no relevant transfer where original employer is one of several transferees

  The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that there is no relevant TUPE transfer where a restructure results in an employee moving from an employment contract with one employer to an employment contract with several employers, including the original employer.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  Jessica Alice-Curtis is a trainee solicitor, Lucy Melville is a paralegal and Nigel Cousin, David Rintoul and Rachael Wake are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  David Malamatenios is a partner and Sandra Martins, Krishna Santra and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  TUPE transfers: employee on indefinite sick leave not transferred

  An Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employee, not working in his employer's business because of health problems, but retained as an employee to receive permanent health insurance (PHI) payments, was not "assigned" to the organised grouping of employees for the purposes of a TUPE transfer.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  TUPE: A third party cannot dictate whether or not an employee is "assigned"

  A recent ruling in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) gives clarity about when an employee is "assigned" to an employer before a TUPE transfer. In his latest TUPE update, Dr John McMullen explains the ruling's implications for employers.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  David Malamatenios is a partner, Colin Makin, Sandra Martins and Krishna Santra are senior associates, and Hinal Raichura is a trainee at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

• Type:

  FAQs

  Can an employer change the terms and conditions of transferred employees if a certain amount of time has passed since the TUPE transfer?